в данной статье рассмотрена проблема безопасности труда. В работе проанализирован теория Гилберта и представлены 6 измерений данной теории.
измерениекультура трудабезопасность трудаГилбертReferences1. Zohar D. A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology. – 85(4). – 2000. – P. 587–596.ZoharD.A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology2. Griffin M. & Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: A framework forlinking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. – 5 (3). – 2000. – P. 347–358.GriffinM.NealA.& Perceptions of safety at work: A framework forlinking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology3. Mohamed S. Safety climate in construction site environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5). – 2002. – P. 375–384.MohamedS.Safety climate in construction site environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5)4. Richter A. & Koch C. Integration, differentiation, and ambiguity in safety cultures. Safety Science. – 42. – 2004. – P. 703–722.RichterA.KochC.& Integration, differentiation, and ambiguity in safety cultures. Safety Science5. Seo D. An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Safety Science. – 43. – 2005. – P. 187–211.SeoD.An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Safety Science6. Lawrie M., Parker D., & Hudson P. Investigating employee perceptions of a framework of safety culture maturity. Safety Science. – 44. – 2006. – P. 259–276.LawrieM.ParkerD.HudsonP.& Investigating employee perceptions of a framework of safety culture maturity. Safety Science7. Veltri A., Pagell M., Behm M., & Das A. A data-based evaluation of the relationship between occupational safety and operating performance. The Journal of SH&E Research. – 4 (1). – 2007. – P. 2–22.VeltriA.PagellM.BehmM.DasA., & A data-based evaluation of the relationship between occupational safety and operating performance. The Journal of SH&E Research8. Gilbert T. Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York: McGraw-Hill. – 1978.GilbertT.Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York: McGraw-Hill9. Geller E. The truth about safety incentives. Professional Safety. – 41(10). – 1996. – P. 34–39.GellerE.The truth about safety incentives. Professional Safety10. Farrington-Darby T., Pickup L., & Wilson J. Safety culture in railwaymaintenance. Safety Science. – 43, 39. – 2005.PickupL.WilsonJ.Farrington-Darby T.,, & Safety culture in railwaymaintenance. Safety Science11. Cooper M.D. Towards a model of safety culture. Applied Behavioural Sciences, Ltd. Retrieved February 13, 2005 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://behavioural-safety.com/articles/Towards_A_Model_Of_Safety_Culture/CooperM. D.SciencesL.Towards a model of safety culture. Applied Behavioural Retrieved February 13, 2005http://behavioural-safety.com/articles/Towards_A_Model_Of_Safety_Culture/12. Sorenson J. Safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. – 76. – 2002. – P. 189–204.SorensonJ.Safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Reliability Engineering and System Safety13. Harvey J., Erdos G., Bolam H., Cox M., Kennedy J., & Gregory D. An analysis of safety culture attitudes in a highly regulated environment. Work & Stress. – 16 (1). – 2002. – P. 18–36.HarveyJ.ErdosG.BolamH.CoxM.KennedyJ.GregoryD.,,,, & An analysis of safety culture attitudes in a highly regulated environment. Work & Stress14. Schein. E. Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45. – 1990. – P. 109–119.Schein. E. Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 4515. Senge P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Currency Doubleday. – 2006.SengeP.The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Currency Doubleday16. Bohm M., A. Veltri, Klein and Sorge J. The cost of security: a model of cost analysis helps build business security. Professional Safety. – 49 (4). – 2004. – P. 22–29.BohmM.SorgeJ.VeltriA., Klein and The cost of security17. Smelman SI, John G. British director perspectives on the impact of health and safety on the corporate performance. Safety Science. – 38. – 2001. – P. 227–239.JohnG.Smelman SI, British director perspectives on the impact of health and safety on the corporate performance. Safety Science18. G. warp Dong, H. Miller T., E. Haile and people Y. The cost of occupational injuries in construction in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention. – 39. – 2007. – P. 1258–1266.MillerT.DongH.G. warp, E. Haile and people Y. The cost of occupational injuries in construction in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention19. Jervis S. & Collins T. Measuring return on investment security. Professional Safety. – 46 (9). – 2001. – P. 18–25.JervisS.CollinsT.& Measuring return on investment security. Professional Safety20. Sanders E. & Cook R. Financial income from the organizational culture of improvement: Translation «soft» changes to «hard» dollars. Paper presented at the 2005 ASTD Expo. Source April 17, 2008 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http: //www.matrixnetworks. net.au/ page.asp? p_id =37SandersE.CookR.& Financial income from the organizational culture of improvement: Translation «soft» changes to «hard» dollars. Paper presented at the 2005 ASTD Expo. Source April 17, 2008net.au/21. Flam Holtz E. Corporate culture and bottom line. European Management Journal, 19 (3). – 2001. – P. 268–275.HoltzE.Flam Corporate culture and bottom line. European Management Journal, 19 (3)22. Biddle E. Ray T. Owusu – Edusei K., and Camm T. Synthesis and recommendations of the economic evaluation of labor protection measures at the company level. Journal of Security Studies. – 36. – 2005. – P. 261–267.BiddleE.RayT.EduseiK.CammT.Owusu –, and Synthesis and recommendations of the economic evaluation of labor protection measures at the company level. Journal of Security Studies23. Linhard, John. Understanding the return of investment on health, safety and environmental protection. Journal of Security Studies. – 36. – 2005. – P. 257–260.Linhard, John. Understanding the return of investment on health, safety and environmental protection. Journal of Security Studies24. Amador-rodezno R. Self-assessment review of SSO in terms of costs and benefits of investment in occupational safety and health of the textile factories: «Step-by-step methodology. Journal of Security Studies. – 36. – 2005. – P. 215–229.Amador-rodezno R. Self-assessment review of SSO in terms of costs and benefits of investment in occupational safety and health of the textile factories: «Step-by-step methodology. Journal of Security Studies25. Koningsveld E. (2005). Participation for understanding: An interactive method. Journal of Security Studies. – 36. – 2005. – P. 231–236.KoningsveldE.(2005). Participation for understanding: An interactive method. Journal of Security Studies26. Bergstrom M. Potentially economic tool evaluation methodology. Safety Research Journal. – 36. – 2005. – P. 237–240.BergstromM.Potentially economic tool evaluation methodology. Safety Research Journal27. Oxen Burg M & Marlowe P. Instrument performance evaluation model: based on computer analysis of costs and benefits for the economic evaluation of health and safety measures at the workplace. Journal of Security Studies. – 36. – 2001. – P. 209–214.MarloweP.Oxen Burg M & Instrument performance evaluation model: based on computer analysis of costs and benefits for the economic evaluation of health and safety measures at the workplace. Journal of Security Studies28. Veltri, Pagell M. Boehm M., & Das A. The evaluation of the data on the basis of the relationship between occupational safety and operations. E & S. Journal Research. – 4 (1). – 2007. – P. 2–22.PagellM.BoehmM.DasA.Veltri,, & The evaluation of the data on the basis of the relationship between occupational safety and operations. E & S. Journal Research29. Mohamed S. approach to performance Bench markingu organizational safety culture in construction. Journal of Structural Engineering and Management. – 129 (1). – 2003. – P. 80–88.MohamedS.approach to performance Bench markingu organizational safety culture in construction. Journal of Structural Engineering and Management30. Kaplan R. and Norton D. Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to create corporate synergies. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. – 2006.KaplanR.NortonD.and Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to create corporate synergies. Boston: Harvard Business School Press31. McClain D. and Jarrell K. Expectations of perceived safety and compatibility in the production of hazardous occupations. Journal of Security Studies, 38. – 2007. – P. 299–309.JarrellK.McClain D. and Expectations of perceived safety and compatibility in the production of hazardous occupations. Journal of Security Studies, 3832. Findlay M., Smith S., Kress T. Petty G., Enoch K. Software security elements in construction: How better to prevent and control injuries related to the cost of workers’ compensation? Professional Safety. – 49 (2). – 2004. – P. 14–22.FindlayM.SmithS.KressT.PettyG.EnochK.,, Software security elements in construction: How better to prevent and control injuries related to the cost of workers’ compensation? Professional Safety33. Barling J., Iverson R., Kelloway E. Random results: in relation to those consequences of injuries in the workplace. Journal of Health Psychology, 8 (1). – 2003. – P. 74–85.BarlingJ.IversonR.KellowayE., Random results34. Loomes G. (How) can we appreciate the health, safety and the environment? Journal of Economic Psychology. – 27. – 2006. – P. 713–736.LoomesG.(How) can we appreciate the health, safety and the environment? Journal of Economic Psychology35. Ayomoh M. & Oke S. The framework for measuring the level of safety for production environments. Safety Science. – 44. – 2006. – P. 221–239.AyomohM.OkeS.& The framework for measuring the level of safety for production environments. Safety Science36. Griffin M. & Neal A. The perception of safety: Safety Structure forlinking climate safety performance, knowledge and motivation. Journal of Occupational Psychology of Health. – 5 (3). – 2003. – P. 347–358.GriffinM.NealA.& The perception of safety: Safety Structure forlinking climate safety performance, knowledge and motivation. Journal of Occupational Psychology of Health37. Cook D. & Rohleder T. Learning from incidents ranging from accidents in conventional high reliability. System Dynamics Review, 22 (3). – 2006. – P. 213–239.CookD.RohlederT.& Learning from incidents ranging from accidents in conventional high reliability. System Dynamics Review, 22 (3)38. Taylor J. and Thomas R. Measurements of the safety culture in the aviation Contents: Structure of trust and professionalism. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13 (4). – 2003. – P. 321–343.TaylorJ.ThomasR.and Measurements of the safety culture in the aviation Contents: Structure of trust and professionalism. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13 (4)39. Hevold John. Safety culture in the Norwegian shipping company. Journal of Safety Research. – 36. – 2007. – P. 441–458.Hevold John. Safety culture in the Norwegian shipping company. Journal of Safety Research40. Fernandez-Muniz B. Montes servant J. Vázquez Ordaz S. Safety Culture: An Analysis of causality between its main dimensions. Journal of Safety Research. – 38. – 2007. – P. 627–641.OrdazS.Fernandez-Muniz B. Montes servant J. Vázquez Safety Culture: An Analysis of causality between its main dimensions. Journal of Safety Research41. Mersmann John. Balancing the focus of organizational culture: how to focus on the Casters, staff training and the search for information on the impact the financial performance and the company’s profits. (UMI №3053052). – 2002.Mersmann John. Balancing the focus of organizational culture: how to focus on the Casters, staff training and the search for information on the impact the financial performance and the company’s profits. (UMI №3053052)42. Lahiri S., Gold J., Lowenstein C. Net-cost model for workplace interventions. Journal of Security Studies. – 36. – 2005. – P. 241–255.LahiriS.GoldJ.LowensteinC., Net-cost model for workplace interventions. Journal of Security Studies43. Phillips John. Programme of the return on investment in training and performance improvement (2nd ed.). Boston: Butterworth – Heine Mann. – 2003.Phillips John. Programme of the return on investment in training and performance improvement (2nd ed.). Boston: Butterworth