Научный диалог: вопросы социологии, политологии, философии и истории Research dialogue: issues of sociology, political science, philosophy and history Научный диалог: вопросы социологии, политологии, философии и истории Research dialogue: issues of sociology, political science, philosophy and history 01 01 1900 Чебоксары Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс» 1900 Copyright © Кузютин И. И., 1900 1900 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. 497368 Война: реалистическая теория Voina: realisticheskaia teoriia Кузютин Игорь Игоревич Kuziutin Igor Igorevich Kuzutin.ii@gmail.com ФГБОУ ВО «Московский педагогический государственный университет» Россия FGBOU VO "Moskovskii pedagogicheskii gosudarstvennyi universitet" Russia

актуальность выбранной темы исследования обусловлена спорами об актуальности классической концепции войны сформированной К. Клаузевитцем. В данной работе автор показывает, что несмотря на изменение форм ведения войны, её суть остается неизменной, война, как и прежде остается продолжением политики. В работе автор рассматривает войну как способ реализации интересов субъектов международной политики, которые формируются в рамках индивидуальной стратегической культуры и среды каждого конкретного актора.

 интересы война Клаузевитц гибридной войны стратегическая культура стратегическая среда References Antulio Echevarria, Clausewitz & Contemporary War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 193. Antulio Echevarria, Clausewitz & Contemporary War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 193 Brian P. Fleming, Major, U.S. Army, «Theory of War Paper» (School of Advanced Military Studies: Fort Leavenworth, KS, August, 2010.) For the purposes of this study, war is applicable to both state and non-state actors. Brian P. Army U. S. Fleming, Major,, «Theory of War Paper» (School of Advanced Military Studies: Fort Leavenworth, KS, August, 2010.) For the purposes of this study, war is applicable to both state and non-state actors Building on Thucydides, Colin Gray asserts that war is motivated by «fear, interests or honor.” This monograph asserts that fear and honor are subsets of interests. Correspondingly, Gray declares, «War is a legal concept, a social institution, and is a compound idea that embraces the total relationship between belligerents. In contrast, warfare refers to the actual conduct of war in its military dimension.” See Thucydides, The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War, Robert B. Strassler, ed. (New York: The Free Press, 1996), 43. Colin Gray, War, Peace and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History (Routledge: New York, 2007), 7. Robert B. Building on Thucydides, Colin Gray asserts that war is motivated by «fear, interests or honor.” This monograph asserts that fear and honor are subsets of interests. Correspondingly, Gray declares, «War is a legal concept, a social institution, and is a co Clausewitz, Carl von. On War. Edited and Translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1976. On W. Clausewitz, Carl von. Edited and Translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1976 Harry R. Yarger, Strategic Theory for the 21st Century: The Little Book on Big Strategy (Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, 2006), 25. Harry R. Yarger, Strategic Theory for the 21st Century: The Little Book on Big Strategy (Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, 2006), 25 Thomas Mahnken, «United States Strategic Culture,” Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Comparative Strategic Studies Curriculum, 13 November 2006, 1–5; See also Stathis N. Kalyvas, The Logic of Violence in Civil War (Cambridge, 2006), 7–8. Stathis N. Thomas Mahnken, «United States Strategic Culture,” Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Comparative Strategic Studies Curriculum, 13 November 2006, 1–5; See also Kalyvas, The Logic of Violence in Civil War (Cambridge, 2006), 7–8 U.S. strategic culture emanates from the U.S. Constitution, fortuitous geography, exceptionalist political ideology, capitalist values, Protestant ethics, technological prowess and an expeditionary mentality for the use of its military. See Anita Arms, «Strategic Culture: The American Mind» in Strategy & Its Theorists (Carlisle Barracks: U.S. Army War College 1999), 329–57; Walter McDougall, Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World Since 1776 (New York: Mariner Books, 1998), 4. U.S. strategic culture emanates from the U.S. Constitution, fortuitous geography, exceptionalist political ideology, capitalist values, Protestant ethics, technological prowess and an expeditionary mentality for the use of its military. See Anita Arms, «S