Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Primenenie STEAM-tekhnologii na urokakh kitaiskogo iazyka v srednei shkole

Proceeding
Аll-Russian scientific and practical conference «Updating the educational process in an educational organization. Panorama of upbringing practices»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Аll-Russian scientific and practical conference «Updating the educational process in an educational organization. Panorama of upbringing practices»
Author:
Madatova K. T. 1
Work direction:
Современные технологии в образовании
Rating:
Article accesses:
376
Published in:
eLibrary.ru
1 Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication FSAEI of HE "Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University"
For citation:
Madatova K. T. (2024). Primenenie STEAM-tekhnologii na urokakh kitaiskogo iazyka v srednei shkole. Updating the educational process in an educational organization. Panorama of upbringing practices, 56-59. Чебоксары: SCC "Interactive plus", LLC.

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics

Abstract

Проблема исследования заключается в обеспечении эффективного использования инновационного подхода STEAM-образования в обучении китайскому в средней школе для реализации потенциала обучающихся. Методы исследования включают в себя анализ учебно-методических источников, обобщение опыта педагогов, статистическую обработку результатов, которые представлены в виде теоретического доказательства возможности применения STEAM-технологий для эффективного изучения иностранного языка в междисциплинарном подходе.

References

  1. 1. Gao Y. An emerging giant of science: Achievements and challenges of STEM education in China. In The Age of Stem: Educational Policy and Practice across the World in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. New York: Routledge, 2017. – Pp. 47–66.
  2. 2. Han X., Appelbaum R.P. China’s Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Research Environment: A Snapshot // PLoS ONE. – 2018. – Vol. 13. No. 4.
  3. 3. Herschbach D.R. The STEM Initiative: Constraints and Challenges // JSTE. – 2011. – 48 p.
  4. 4. Herscovitz O., Kaberman, Z., Saar, L., Dori, Y.J. The role of self-monitoring in learning chemistry. In Metacognition in Science Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer. – 2012. – Vol. 40. – Pp. 165–197.
  5. 5. Kelley T.R., Knowles J.G. A Conceptual Framework for STEM Education // Int. J. STEM Educ. – 2016. – Vol. 3. – Pp. 1–11.
  6. 6. Ma Ying. 2021. Reconceptualizing STEM Education in China as Praxis: A Curriculum Turn // Sustainability. – 2021. – Vol. 13. – No. 9. – P. 4961. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094961. EDN: BIAABD
  7. 7. Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China. China’s STEM Education White Paper [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A16/s5886/s7822/201801/t20180111_324362.html (accessed on 21.01.2021).
  8. 8. Siemens-Stiftung. STEM and Values: Creating Values in Science and Technology Education. n.d. Siemens-Stiftung. STEM and Values: Creating Values in Science and Technology Education [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.siemens-stiftung.org/en/foundation/education/stem-and-values/ (accessed on 08.03.2021).
  9. 9. STEM Teachers Competency Level Standards [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://clck.ru/3EJrKs (accessed on 25.01.2021).
  10. 10. Yuan Z.Q. An Exploratory Study on Educating Innovative STEM Teachers. Jiang Su: Feng Huang Press, 2019.
  11. 11. Zhong B., Liu X., Zhan Z. et al. What should a Chinese top-level design in STEM Education look like? Humanit Soc Sci Commun. – 2022. – Vol. 9. – P. 261. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599–022–01279–1. EDN: JFPPIB

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.