Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The reform of 1861 in Stavropol

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-467279
Open Access
International academic journal «Human and Society»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Human and Society»
Author:
Novikova I. E. 1
Work direction:
Общие вопросы исторических наук
Rating:
Article accesses:
2966
Published in:
doaj
КиберЛенинка
eLibrary.ru
1 MBOU SOSh 6
For citation:
Novikova I. Y. (2017). The reform of 1861 in Stavropol. Human and Society, 4-6. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-467279

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Reviewing
  • Metrics
UDC 9

Abstract

This article is devoted to analysis of the socioeconomic features of the peasant reform in the Stavropol region, the main of which was sufficiently low density settlement in the region and the number of serfs. The work includes consideration of the provisions of one of the earliest projects of emancipation of the serfs, created by the largest landowners of the County Pyatigorsk by the Kalantarovs’ brothers. The materials in this article are used from the State archive of the Stavropol territory.

References

  1. 1. GASK, F. 1279, op. 1, d. 1.
  2. 2. Krikunov, V. P. (1949). Krest'ianskaia reforma 1891 goda v Stavropol'skoi gubernii. Stavropol'
  3. 3. Chekmenev, S. A. (1967). Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie Stavropol'ia i Kubani. Piatigorsk

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.