Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The relationship between optimism and success of traders’ economic decisions

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-468958
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Patosha O.I. 1
Work direction:
Психология
Rating:
Article accesses:
2511
Published in:
doaj
КиберЛенинка
eLibrary.ru
1 National Research University «Higher School of Economics»
For citation:
Patosha O. I. (2018). The relationship between optimism and success of traders’ economic decisions. Interactive science, 28-33. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-468958

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Reviewing
  • Metrics
UDC 159.9

Abstract

This article presents the study of optimism and various parameters of economic decisions among traders. There is a contradiction in literature: on one hand, according to the results of the research, optimism is a predictor of successful activity, on the other, it is the cause of errors, especially in making economic decisions. The study was conducted on 630 professional traders, a technology for studying optimism as cognitive distortion was specially developed, as well as a special technique for studying economic decisions. As a result, the parameters of economic decisions were revealed, as well as a positive relationship between optimism and decision parameters.

Acknowledgments

Работа подготовлена при поддержке РФФИ (РГНФ) №16-06-50137 «Оптимизм как фактор принятия экономических решений в условиях неопределенности».

References

  1. 1. Balatskii, E. V. (2010). Rol' optimizma v innovatsionnom razvitii ekonomiki. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, 1, 3-20.
  2. 2. Vashchenko, T. V., & Lisitsyna, E. V. (2006). Povedencheskie finansy. Finansovyi menedzhment, 1.
  3. 3. Grinin, L. E. (2009). Psikhologiia ekonomicheskikh krizisov. Istoricheskaia psikhologiia i sotsiologiia istorii.
  4. 4. Kriukova, T. L. (2007). Adaptatsiia metodiki izmereniia dispozitsionnogo optimizma. Psikhologicheskoe issledovanie: teoriia, metodologiia, praktika, 548-552. Tomsk: Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet.
  5. 5. Mandrikova, E. Iu., & Gorbunova, A. A. (2012). Vzaimosviaz' uvlechennosti rabotoi, lichnostnykh resursov i udovletvorennosti trudom sotrudnikov. Organizatsionnaia psikhologiia, 2-22.
  6. 6. Muzdybaev, K. (2003). Optimizm i pessimizm lichnosti. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 12, 87-96.
  7. 7. Martin, E. P. (2006). Seligman Novaia pozitivnaia psikhologiia: Nauchnyi vzgliad na schast'e i smysl zhizni. M.: Sofiia.
  8. 8. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Optimism [Text]. Handbook of Positive Psychology, 231-243. Oxford, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
  9. 9. Fischhoff, B. (1978). Fault trees: sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4.
  10. 10. Hahn, U. Unrealistic Optimism About Future Life Events: A Cautionary Note. American Psychological Association. 2011., 135-154.
  11. 11. Held, B. S. The tyranny of the positive attitude in America: Observation and Speculation. Journal of clinical psychology., 965-992.
  12. 12. Peterson, C., & Steen, T. A. (2002). Optimistic explanatory style. Handbook of Positive Psychology, 244-256. Oxford, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
  13. 13. Sheier, M. F., Weintraub, J. K., & Carver, C. S. (1986). Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1257-1264.
  14. 14. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.