Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Actual problems of anti-corruption expertise

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-474265
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Authors:
Sheenkov A. A. 1 , Fortova L.K. 2
Work direction:
Юриспруденция
Rating:
Article accesses:
2224
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
1 FSBEI HE "Vladimir Law Institute of the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service"
2 Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
For citation:
Sheenkov A. A., & Fortova L. K. (2018). Actual problems of anti-corruption expertise. Interactive science, 115-118. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-474265

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Reviewing
  • Metrics
UDC 34

Abstract

The current state of the study of the institute of anti-corruption expertise is analyzed in the article, insufficiently regulated issues in the legislation in this area are considered. The authors note that systematic work to improve the normative and methodological support of anti-corruption expertise should now become one of the top priorities of the government.

References

  1. 1. Federal'nyi zakon ot 17.07.2009 172-FZ "Ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov".
  2. 2. Rossinskaia, E. R. (2014). Antikorruptsionnaia ekspertiza normativnykh pravovykh aktov i ikh proektov. M.: Norma; M.: Infra-M.
  3. 3. Vasil'ev, F. P., & Dugenets, A. S. (2010). Antikorruptsionnye ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia, 4, 2.
  4. 4. Talapina, E. V. (2007). Ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 5, 52.
  5. 5. Umanskaia, V. P. Antikorruptsionnaia ekspertiza pravovykh aktov: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniia i pravoprimentitel'noi praktiki. Zakon. -2010, 4, 170.
  6. 6. Kozhevnikov, O. A. (2010). Bor'ba s korruptsiei dolzhna nachinat'sia s ustraneniia defektov antikorruptsionnogo zakonodatel'stva. Pravo i obrazovanie, 3, 74.
  7. 7. Korobkin, A. N. (2012). Problemy osushchestvleniia nezavisimoi antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 9, 60.
  8. 8. Shul'man, E. M. Programma "Status" 20.02.2018. Retrieved from https://echo.msk.ru/programs/status/2151156-echo/
  9. 9. Astanin, V. V. (2013). Obespechenie reprezentativnosti ekspertizy na korruptsiogennost' proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov. Antikorruptsionnaia ekspertiza normativno-pravovykh aktov i ikh proektov: Sbornik nauchnykh statei, 10-11. M.: Prospekt.
  10. 10. Balugian, A. S. (2015). Problemy osushchestvleniia nezavisimoi antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy. Biulleten' Ministerstva iustitsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 7, 35.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.