Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The Image of the Other in Religious Discourse: The Ukrainian Election Campaign Case

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-552049
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Doroshko A. S. 1
Work direction:
Политология
Rating:
Article accesses:
1548
Published in:
eLibrary.ru
1 FSBEI of HE "Saint Petersburg State University"
For citation:

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 322

Abstract

The article concentrated on the topic of using religious discourse for political purposes. The example of the presidential election campaign in Ukraine (2018–2019) shows that religious discourse is inextricably linked to the issue of national identity in the Ukrainian political process. This conclusion has been made of discourse analysis the news reports which were in Ukrainian TV channels during the election campaign: 1+1, Inter, ICTV and TRC Ukraine.

References

  1. 1. Abakumova, V. I., & Slinchenko, L. V. (2019). Analiz manipuliativnykh tekhnologii prezidentskoi izbiratel'noi kampanii na Ukraine g. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 449, 76.
  2. 2. Anisimova, E. E. (2019). Religioznyi diskurs: funktsional'nyi i antropologicheskii aspekty: monografiia., 240. M.: Izd-vo MGLU.
  3. 3. Bluvberg, S. V. (2008). Spetsificheskie priznaki sovremennogo nemetskogo protestanskogo propovednicheskogo diskursa. Vestnik Iuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Lingvistika, 16 (116), 69-73.
  4. 4. Bobyreva, E. V. Religioznyi diskurs: tsennosti, zhanry, strategii., 374.
  5. 5. Kulikovoi, L. V. (2015). Diskursivnye praktiki sovremennoi institutsional'noi kommunikatsii: monografiia., 182. Krasnoiarsk: Izd-vo Sib. feder. un-ta.
  6. 6. Il'in, M. V. (2002). Politicheskii diskurs kak predmet analiza. Politicheskaia nauka, 3, 5-21.
  7. 7. Karasik, V. I. (2000). Struktura institutsional'nogo diskursa. Problemy rechevoi kommunikatsii, S. 25-33.
  8. 8. Karasik, V. (1998). O kategoriiakh diskursa. Iazykovaia lichnost', S. 185-197.
  9. 9. Konstitutsiia Ukraini. Cait Zakonodavstvo Ukraini. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80
  10. 10. Negrov, E. O. (2019). Diskursivnye praktiki manifestirovaniia identichnosti v sovremennoi Evrope: na primere izbiratel'noi kampanii po vyboram v evropeiskii parlament v godu. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniia, 3 (33), S. 116-129.
  11. 11. Pereverzov, E. V. (2009). Kriticheskii diskurs-analiz: ot teorii k praktike. Iazyk. Tekst. Diskurs, 7, 105-116.
  12. 12. Podrobnosti nedeli ot 21.09.2018. YouTube kanal Podrobnosti. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WC7BWb_mpU&list=PL3Bh8iJueUK2IyJK3wz_BsI69vqsMS5-P&index=68
  13. 13. Podrobnosti nedeli ot 14.12.2018. YouTube kanal Podrobnosti. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3ZOHN32Z1U&list=PL3Bh8iJueUK2IyJK3wz_BsI69vqsMS5-P&index=55
  14. 14. Prilutskii, A. M. (2006). Diskurs teologii., 416. SPb.: Svetoch.
  15. 15. Pro svobodu sovisti ta religiini organizatsiyi. Cait Zakonodavstvo Ukraini. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/987-12
  16. 16. C'ogodni. Pidsumki ot 14.10.2018. Ofitsial'nyi sait TRK "Ukraina". Retrieved from https://syogodni-pidsumky.kanalukraina.tv/episode/sogodni-pidsumki-za-14-10-2018-19-00?_ga=2.218762001.986831713.1589376204-88573080.1589376204
  17. 17. Toshchenko, Zh. T. (2007). Teokratiia: fenomen ili real'nost'?., 664. M.: Academia.
  18. 18. TSN. Tizhden'. Ofitsial'nyi sait kanala "1+1". Retrieved from https://1plus1.intern
  19. 19. Fakty Tizhnia. YouTube kanal Telkanalala ICTV. Retrieved from https://ictv.ua/ru/
  20. 20. Shevchenko, A. Iu. (2002). Diskurs-analiz politicheskikh media-testov. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 6, 18-23.
  21. 21. Sheigal, E. I., & Chervatiuk, I. S. (2007). Tipy zhanrov i gradatsiia kommunikativnoi vlasti. Zhanry rechi, 5, 63-81.
  22. 22. (1998). DIJK, TEUN VAN Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.