Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Forms of Participation of Several Persons in the Commission of Crimes

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-553150
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Libenzon E.L. 1
Work direction:
Юриспруденция
Rating:
Article accesses:
1420
Published in:
eLibrary.ru
1 FSE of HE "Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation”
For citation:
Libenzon E. L. (2021). Forms of Participation of Several Persons in the Commission of Crimes. Interactive science, 63-69. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-553150

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 343.221

Abstract

The article reveals the legal nature of complicity in a crime, the objective and subjective signs of complicity, gives a description of complicity, examines the main problems that practitioners face in resolving the problems of criminal law regulation of joint participation in a crime, including the presence in the norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code RF, provides a legal assessment of the legality of establishing responsibility for certain types of actions of accomplices, whose criminal liability is presented as independent offenses

References

  1. 1. "Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii" ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 31.07.2020). SPS "Konsul'tant Plius" (data obrashcheniia: 25.09.2020).
  2. 2. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 27.12.2002 g. 29 "O sudebnoi praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe" Sistema GARANT: (data obrashcheniia 08.06.2020). Retrieved from http://base.garant.ru/1352873/#ixzz6OxZe3LLp
  3. 3. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 10 iiunia 2010 g. 12 g. Moskva "O sudebnoi praktike rassmotreniia ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoi organizatsii) ili uchastii v nem (nei)".
  4. 4. Mondokhonova, A. G. (2010). Voprosy ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za organizatsiiu prestupnogo soobshchestva. Ugolovnoe pravo.
  5. 5. Subachiov, A. K. Institut souchastiia v prestuplenii i ego otrazhenie v normakh osobennoi chasti Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii.
  6. 6. Opredelenie Sudebnoi kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 01.06.2010 g. po delu 81-d-10-11. Retrieved from http://www.vsrf.ru/stor_pdf.php?id=298020
  7. 7. Kapinus, O. A. (2019). Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo prava: kurs lektsii. M.: Prospekt.
  8. 8. Esakov, G. A., & Esakov, A. G. (2011). Kvalifikatsiia sovmestnogo soversheniia prestupleniia s litsom, ne podlezhashchim ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti: novyi povorot v sudebnoi praktike. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2, 14.
  9. 9. Trukhin, A. M. (2006). Souchastnik prestupleniia. Ugolovnoe pravo, 3.
  10. 10. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Tomskogo oblastnogo suda ot 25.12.2013 po delu 44u-285. SPS "Konsul'tant Plius" (data obrashcheniia: 24.09.2020).

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.