telephone:+7 (8352) 222-490
Mail:info@interactive-plus.ru
rus eng


  1. Main
  2. Journal "Interactive science"
  3. No 5
  4. The role of evaluation in newspaper headlines (by...
Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The role of evaluation in newspaper headlines (by the texts of “The Washington Post”)

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-111927
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Bulgakova O. I. 1
Scientific adviser:
Zalesova N. M.1
Work direction:
Филология
Rating:
Article accesses:
3526
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
1 FSBEI of HE "Amur State University"
For citation:
Bulgakova O. I. (2016). The role of evaluation in newspaper headlines (by the texts of “The Washington Post”). Interactive science, 57-58. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-111927
  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
  • Related articles
UDC 81

Abstract

The aim of the article is to study the role the evaluation plays in the headlines about the election campaign in the USA. The research allows to characterize the image of the candidate for presidency in the USA – Hillary Clinton, formed by the media from the view of different subjects of evaluation.

References

  1. 1. Желтухина М.Р. Специфика речевого воздействия тропов в языке СМИ: Автореф. дисс. … д-ра филол. наук: 10.02.19 / М.Р. Желтухина. – М., 2004. – 47 с.
  2. 2. Merriam-webster.com [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary (дата обращения: 14.05.2016–12.06.2016).

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.