Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Issledovanie praktiki i analiz problem adaptatsii stress-testirovaniia rossiiskimi bankami

Theses of Report
Published in:
International Extra-murral Online Conference «Research dialogue: Finances and Credit»
Author:
Krasheninnikov N. V. 1
Work direction:
Банковское дело
Rating:
Article accesses:
1929
1 FSFEI of HE "Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation"
For citation:
Krasheninnikov N. V. (Jan 1, 1900). Issledovanie praktiki i analiz problem adaptatsii stress-testirovaniia rossiiskimi bankami. Research dialogue: Finances and Credit. Cheboksary: SCC "Interactive plus", LLC. Retrieved April 02, 2025, from https:/interactive-plus.ru/en/article/17976/discussion_platform

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics

Abstract

The article analyze the experience of the largest Russian banks in terms of the "stress-testing" business process organization in the risk-management system. The research highlighted a number of specific issues related to the active adaptation of this tool in the system of bank risk management. The article concluded that the problem of multi-directional objectives pursued by the regulator and the banking business is not solved.

References

  1. 1. Указание ЦБ РФ 3876-У от 3.12.2015 г. «О формах, порядке и сроках раскрытия кредитными организациями банковских групп инф. о принимаемых рисках, процедурах их оценки, управления рисками и капиталом» [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.cbr.ru/analytics/standart_acts/bank_supervision/151130/10.pdf.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.