Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Taxonomic formula of geoecological hazard for the cadastral districts of Moscow city

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-466910
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Authors:
Karfidova E.A. 1 , Komarevskaia M. N. 1
Work direction:
Тема номера
Rating:
Article accesses:
2825
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
КиберЛенинка
1 FSBIS Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience RAS
For citation:
Karfidova E. A., & Komarevskaia M. N. (2018). Taxonomic formula of geoecological hazard for the cadastral districts of Moscow city. Interactive science, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-466910

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 502/5

Abstract

The article proposes a method for calculating the taxonomic formula for the geoecological hazard of the cadastral district. The engineering-geological zoning map uses for calculating the balance of the territory by the hazard index – the basis of the taxonomic formula. The taxonomic formula as an open data set makes it possible to characterize the geoecological hazards of the territory of a district. The geoenvironmental hazard map of cadastral districts is necessary for regional model of spatial planning at the municipal level.

References

  1. 1. Antipov, A. V., & Osipov, V. I. (2009). Printsipy inzhenerno-geologicheskogo raionirovaniia territorii Moskvy. Geologiia. Inzhenernaia geologiia. Gidrogeologiia. Geokriologiia, 1, pp. 3-13.
  2. 2. Osipov, V. I., & Burova, V. N. (2011). Karta krupnomasshtabnogo (detal'nogo) inzhenerno-geologicheskogo raionirovaniia territorii g. Moskvy. Geoekologiia. Inzhenernaia geologiia, gidrogeologiia, geokriologiia, 4, pp. 306-319.
  3. 3. Smirnova, O. O. (2013). Pravovye osnovy strategicheskogo planirovaniia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M.: Izdatel'skii Dom "Nauka"
  4. 4. Sizov, A. P., & Karfidova, E. A. (2016). Neobkhodimaia informatsionno-metodicheskaia osnova srednesrochnogo planirovaniia. Trudy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii "Aktual'nye problemy prirodoobustroistva, kadastra i zemlepol'zovaniia". Voronezh
  5. 5. Bachurina, S. S., Beliaev, V. L., & Karfidova, E. A. (2016). Geoekologicheskie aspekty razrabotki regional'noi modeli territorial'nogo planirovaniia (na primere Moskvy). Geoekologiia. Inzhenernaia geologiia. Gidrogeologiia. Geokriologiia, 1, pp. 3-19.
  6. 6. Karfidova, E. A., & Sizov, A. P. (2016). Neobkhodimost' geoekologicheskikh issledovanii v strategicheskom i srednesrochnom planirovanii. Sbornik trudov nauchnoi konferentsii "18-e Sergeevskie chteniia. Inzhenernaia geologiia i geoekologiia. Fundamental'nye problemy i prikladnye zadachi".
  7. 7. (2017). Lesnoi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 04.12.2006 200-FZ (red. ot 01.07.2017). Konsul'tant Plius
  8. 8. (1984). Taksatsiia i lesoustroistvo. Prirost drevesiny v drevostoe. Klassifikatsiia i simvolika, osnovnye raschetnye formuly. Terminy i opredeleniia. M.: TsBNTIleskhoz
  9. 9. (2008). Taksatsiia lesa. M.: GOU VPO MGUL
  10. 10. Osipov, V. I., Burova, V. N., & Karfidova, E. A. (2015). Formirovanie svedenii o geoekologicheskikh usloviiakh v granitsakh kadastrovogo deleniia territorii g. Moskvy. Sergeevskie chteniia. Inzhenerno-geologicheskie i geoekologicheskie problemy gorodskikh aglomeratsii, pp. 76-82. M.: RUDN
  11. 11. Osipov, V., & Karfidova, E. (2016). G. Batrak The Drain Net Modeling On The Base Terrestrial And Radar Data. Comparative Analysis. GEOS. doi:10.5176/2251-3353_GEOS16.35.
  12. 12. Karfidova, E. A., & Batrak, G. I. (2017). GIS-issledovaniia poverkhnostnogo stoka urbanizirovannykh territorii. ArcReview, 3.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.