Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Classification approach to the analysis of the factors of universities’ internationalization strategy success

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-472710
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Authors:
Malyzhenkov P. V. 1 , Masi M. 1
Work direction:
Экономика
Rating:
Article accesses:
2337
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
1 University of Tuscia
For citation:
Malyzhenkov P. V., & Masi M. (2018). Classification approach to the analysis of the factors of universities’ internationalization strategy success. Interactive science, 58-60. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-472710

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 33

Abstract

The present work analyses the state-of-the art of internationalization strategies of the universities and delivers the classification of the main factors of its successful realization.

References

  1. 1. Arnaboldi M., Azzone G. (2010), «Constructing performance measurement in the public sector», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21 (4), pp. 266–282.
  2. 2. Borgonovi E., Giordano F. (2007), «La valutazione dell’università: aspetti sistematici ed operativi», in Cugini A. (a cura di), La misurazione della performance negli atenei. Logiche, metodi, esperienze, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. 3. Bronzetti G., Mazzotta R., Nardo M.T. (2011), «Le dimensioni della pianificazione strategica nelle università», Economia aziendale online, 2 (2), pp. 141–155.
  4. 4. Cugini A., Michelon G. (2009), «La misurazione della performance nei dipartimenti universitari», Economia e management, 4, pp. 91–109.
  5. 5. Cugini A., Pilonato S. (2007), «La misurazione della performance negli atenei: evidenze dalle pubblicazioni italiane dell’ultimo decennio», Azienda pubblica, 20 (2), pp. 217–241.
  6. 6. Fici L., Malyzhenkov P.V., Piccarozzi M., Meleshina E.S. (2016) Spin-off design as an organizational practice: A methodological approach. Business Informatics, no. 3 (37), pp. 7–14. DOI: 10.17323/1998–0663.2016.3.7.14.
  7. 7. Fici L., Piccarozzi M. (2010) Create value at the university: Financial and management problems in USOs. History of Accounting, Business Administration Doctrines and Development of New Methods of Management in Italy and in Russia. III International Workshop (Viterbo, Florence, Italy, 21–23 September 2009). Milano: RIREA, pp. 234–249.
  8. 8. Fontana G., «Che lingua parla l’Università italiana?" Osservatorio dell'Associazione Italiana dei Costituzionalisti, giugno 2013.
  9. 9. Hazelkorn, E. How Rankings are Reshaping Higher Education in Climent, V., Michavila, F. and Ripolles, M. (eds) Los Rankings Univeritarios. Mitos y Realidades, Dublin Institute of Technology, 2013.
  10. 10. Hicks D. (2012), «Performance-based university research funding systems», Research policy, 41 (2), pp. 251–261.
  11. 11. «Indicatori di internazionalizzazione del sistema universitario italiano», Gruppo di lavoro CRUI sull’internazionalizzazione, 2015.
  12. 12. Masi M., Rossi F., Malyzhenkov P., Technical and management innovation in the process of treatment of special and hazardous waste in a perspective of circular economy, Atti del XVII Congresso AISME «Qualità & Innovazione per una economia circolare ed un futuro sostenibile», Università degli Studi della Tuscia, 2–4 marzo 2016, pp. 103–107.
  13. 13. Morgan, J., Germany and Malaysia «top performers’ for internationalization, Times Higher Education, 4 maggio 2016.
  14. 14. «Prospettive europee per la mobilità e l’internazionalizzazione dell’istruzione superiore», Bruxelles, 2016.
  15. 15. Riccaboni A. (2003), «La valutazione integrata della didattica e della ricerca: il progetto VAI nell’Università di Siena», Azienda pubblica, 16 (5/6), pp. 463–493.
  16. 16. Sav G.T. (2013), «Four-stage DEA efficiency evaluations: financial reforms in public university funding», International journal of economics and finance, 5 (1), pp. 24–33.
  17. 17. Stergiou K., Athanassios C. «Global university reputation and rankings: insights from culturomics», Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics; vol. 13, 2013.
  18. 18. Ter Bogt H.J., Scapens R.W. (2012), «Performance management in universities: effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems», European accounting review, 21 (3), pp. 451–497.
  19. 19. Tochkov K., Nenovsky N., Tochkov K. (2012), «University efficiency and public funding for higher education in Bulgaria», Post-Communist economies, 24 (4), pp. 517–534.
  20. 20. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.arwu.org/
  21. 21. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.shanghairanking.com/
  22. 22. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/
  23. 23. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.leidenranking.com/
  24. 24. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.webometrics.info/
  25. 25. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.umultirank.org/

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.