Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The procedure for holding public hearings in international practice

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-474677
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Authors:
Ivanova Z. I. 1 , Danilina N. V. 1
Work direction:
Социология
Rating:
Article accesses:
1913
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
1 FSBEI of HE "National Research University Moscow State University of Civil Engineering"
For citation:
Ivanova Z. I., & Danilina N. V. (2018). The procedure for holding public hearings in international practice. Interactive science, 63-65. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-474677

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Reviewing
  • Metrics
UDC 31

Abstract

The problems of public hearings, their organization and conduct are debatable around the world. This institution of self-government is being improved in accordance with the expansion of citizens' rights in the management of urban processes, the introduction of information technologies in the implementation process. In Russia, the Federal Law №212 dated July 21, 2017 introduced changes to the Urban Development Code of the Russian Federation to improve the effectiveness of this institution in the conditions of informatization and digitalization. The authors of this article conducted a comparative analysis of the forms and procedures of organization, issues discussed in world practice, and concluded that in European countries, the USA, Canada the range of issues discussed at public hearings is wider, information technologies are used more widely, and decisions are mandatory for making. In Russia, the results of public hearings have no legal status. A study of world practices is required to use the positive experience of other countries in ensuring the effectiveness of this institution.

Acknowledgments

Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта №18-011-01004.

References

  1. 1. Federal'nyi zakon ot 29 dekabria 2017 goda 455-FZ "O vnesenii izmenenii v Gradostroitel'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii". Retrieved from www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_286726/
  2. 2. . Retrieved from https://www.richmond.ca/cityhall/council/meeting/WebAgendaMinutesList.aspx?Category=25&Year=2018.
  3. 3. . Retrieved from https://www.pc.gov.au/about/core-functions/inquiries-and-studies/what-is-a-public-hearing
  4. 4. . Retrieved from http://a100.gov.bc.ca/appsdata/epic/html/deploy/epic_project_home_371.html
  5. 5. Profile of the Danish system Environmental effect estimation and public participation. Retrieved from http://ecom.su/technologies_materials/index.php?id=472.
  6. 6. 21st Century Town Meeting. Retrieved from https://participedia.net/en/methods/21st-century-town-meeting
  7. 7. AmericaSpeaks. Retrieved from http://www.americaspeaks.org/
  8. 8. Lukensmeyer, C. J. 21st Century Town Meeting. Participatory Methods Tool Kit - A Practitioner's Manual. Eds. Stef Steyaert and Herve Lisoir. Jointly published by King Baudouin Foundation and the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment. Retrieved from http://ist.vito.be/en/pdf/projects/toolkitworldcaf.pdf

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.