Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Thinking Traps: Cognitive Distortions in Parenting Practices

Research Article
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Kogur N. E. 1
Work direction:
Психология
Rating:
Article accesses:
507
Published in:
eLibrary.ru
1 GKU SO MO Semeinyi tsentr pomoshchi sem'e i detiam "Vdokhnovenie"
For citation:
Kogur N. E. (2023). Thinking Traps: Cognitive Distortions in Parenting Practices. Interactive science, 37-39.

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 1

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of cognitive distortions that are most often encountered in the practice of education and are assessed from the perspective of scenario prescriptions. Examples of transformation of parental attitudes into independent limiting beliefs are considered, and a model for the formation of a child’s scenario response to a negative parental message is described. A linear algorithm for reducing the intensity of the influence of cognitive distortions on the mental life of a subject is presented.

References

  1. 1. Боброва Л.А. Когнитивные искажения / Л.А. Боброва // Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия: Философия. – 2021. – №2. – С. 69–79.
  2. 2. Канеман Д. Думай медленно… Решай быстро / Д. Канеман; пер. с англ. В.И. Баканов – М.: АСТ, 2023. – 656 с.
  3. 3. Филатов А.В. Ловушки и иллюзии мозга / А.В. Филатов. – М.: АСТ, 2021. – 352 с.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.