Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Azerbaijan Digital Hub: Strategy in Action

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-561238
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Gasymly V. 1
Work direction:
Экономика
Rating:
Article accesses:
513
Published in:
eLibrary.ru
1 Tsentr analiza ekonomicheskikh reform i kommunikatsii Azerbaidzhana
For citation:
Gasymly V. (2023). Azerbaijan Digital Hub: Strategy in Action. Interactive science, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-561238

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 031; 032

Abstract

The article explores the digital transformation landscape under pandemic and post-pandemic conditions. As global internet traffic continues to surge, nations worldwide are prioritizing digital strategies to keep pace with this rapid transformation. Azerbaijan, an oil-rich country seeking economic diversification, has taken a strategic approach to become a key player in the digital landscape. Neqsol Holding, utilizing its capital from the oil and gas industry, initiated the Azerbaijan Digital Hub, a comprehensive program comprising the Digital Silk Road, a Regional Data Center, an Internet Exchange Point, and the development of a digital ecosystem. The hub aims to reshape the internet map along the Silk Way and thrive amidst disruptive changes through three consecutive stages: ideation, incubation, and scaling. The article highlights the strategic choices made by Azerbaijan in establishing the Digital Hub and its potential impact on the nation's economy. It presents the shift from the «Castles» quadrant to the «Connectors» quadrant, adopting new power models and values for sustainable growth. The dynamic capabilities of the Digital Hub are explored, emphasizing its transformative nature and adaptability to rapid technological advancements. In conclusion, the article suggests that the success of the Azerbaijan Digital Hub depends on effective management of continuous change, fostering a culture of innovation, and leveraging strategic advantages through mergers, alliances, and investments. By navigating a complex and uncertain environment, the Digital Hub can solidify its position as a crucial player in the digital era.

References

  1. 1. Azərbaycanın Regional Rəqəmsal Qovşaq Yolunda – Daha bir qlobal layihədə birincilik [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://ordu.az/az/news/226990
  2. 2. «Azerbaijan Digital Hub» proqramının rəqəmsal iqtisadiyyat quruculuğuna töhfəsi müzakirə olunub [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://az.trend.az/business/3193161.html
  3. 3. AzerTelecom, Kazakhtelecom sign strategic partnership memorandum on Trans-Caspian project [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://azertag.az/en/xeber/AzerTelecom_Kazakhtelecom_sign_strategic_partnership_memorandum_on_Trans_Caspian_project-2315015
  4. 4. Banerjee A.V. & Duflo E. (2019). Good economics for hard times. Public Affairs.
  5. 5. Baghirov O. (2020). The increasing role of Azerbaijan as a regional digital hub. Eurasia Daily Monitor, 17 (73) [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://jamestown.org/program/the-increasing-role-of-azerbaijan-as-a-regional-digital-hub/
  6. 6. Bekauri K. (2021). On NEQSOL: There are preconditions for mutual agreement to occur. Forbes [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://forbes.ge/kakha-bekauri-on-neqsol-there-are-preconditions-for-mutual-agreement-to-occur/
  7. 7. Benefits of using DTH (2023) [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://dth.az/
  8. 8. Day G. S. & Schoemaker P.J.H. (2017). How to sense and seize opportunities – and transform your organization [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/ROT355-PDF-ENG
  9. 9. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/26/e3sconf_icsf2020_13016.pdf
  10. 10. Latest on global connectivity amid economic downturn, Facts and figures 2022 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.itu.int/hub/2022/11/facts-and-figures-2022-global-connectivity-statistics/
  11. 11. Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2022 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
  12. 12. Ghemawat, P. (2007). Why the world isn’t flat. Foreign Policy, (159), 54–60.
  13. 13. Guillén, M. & García-Canal, E. (2012). Execution as strategy. Harvard Business Review, 103–107
  14. 14. Gygli S., Haelg F., Potrafke N. & Sturm J-E. (2019). The KOF Globalisation Index – Revisited. Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543–574 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2call_made
  15. 15. Грузинские чиновники пытаются захватить азербайджанскую компанию [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://haqqin.az/comics/185947
  16. 16. Harrison L.E. & Huntington S.P. (2000). Culture matters. Basic Books.
  17. 17. Haussmann R. (2023). Why industrial policy is back. Project Syndicate [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-economists-have-rediscovered-industrial-policy-by-ricardo-hausmann-2023–01?utm_source=Project+Syndicate+Newsletter&utm_campaign=759b5575d4-covid_newsletter_02_01_2023&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_73bad5b7d8–759b5575d4–107109909&mc_cid=759b5575d4&mc_eid=0272b88f2b
  18. 18. Heimans J., & Timms H. (2014). Understanding «new power». Harvard Business Review, 92(12): 48–56.
  19. 19. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.adh.az/en/cooperation
  20. 20. Huawei (2021). Accelerating the digital economy: Four key enablers [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://e.huawei.com/kz/eblog/industries/insights/2021/accelerating-digital-economy
  21. 21. Huy Q. N. (2002). Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1): 31–69. EDN EEZICJ
  22. 22. Johnson G., Yip G.S. & Hensmans M. (2012) Achieving successful strategic transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3): 25–32.
  23. 23. Kazakhstan-Azerbaijan: New opportunities for cooperation (2021). Discussion of Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable Project [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.adh.az/en/news/transcaspian-fiber-optic-cable-project-discussed-at-kazakhstanazerbaijan-new-opportunities-for-cooperation-event-05-03-2021
  24. 24. Kegan R. & Laskow Lahey L. (2001). The real reason people will not change. Harvard Business Review
  25. 25. Korotov K. & Sack N. (2019). Gisbert Rühl: Leading digital transformation at Klöckner & Co. Harvard Business Review.
  26. 26. Lawrence T.B., Dyck B., Maitlis S. and Mauws M.K. (2006). The underlying structure of continuous change. Sloan Management Review 47(4), 59–66.
  27. 27. Maitlis S., Vogus T.J. & Lawrence T.B. (2013). Sensemaking and emotion in organizations. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(3), 1–26 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://doi-org.ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/10.1177/2041386613489062
  28. 28. Martin R.L. (2010). The execution trap. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 64–71.
  29. 29. Martin R.L. (2017). Strategic choices need to be made simultaneously, not sequentially, Harvard Business Review [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://hbr.org/2017/04/strategic-choices-need-to-be-made-simultaneously-not-sequentially
  30. 30. Mazzucato M. (2023). For the common good, Project Syndicate, 2023 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://inlnk.ru/Pmk3a8
  31. 31. McKinsey [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/global-flows-the-ties-that-bind-in-an-interconnected-world
  32. 32. O’Reilly G. C. & Binns A.J.M. (2019). The three stages of disruptive innovation: Idea generation, incubation, and scaling. California Management Review, 61(3), 49–71 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://cmr.berkeley.edu/assets/documents/sample-articles/61–3-oreilly.pdf
  33. 33. Pisano G. (2019). The hard truth about innovative cultures. Harvard Business Review, 62–71
  34. 34. Porter M. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review Press.
  35. 35. Porter M. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93.
  36. 36. Reid T. (1878). Essays on the intellectual powers of man, 10th ed. J.H. Butler and Co [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://ia800500.us.archive.org/4/items/10edessaysoninte00reiduoft/10edessaysoninte00reiduoft_bw.pdf
  37. 37. Sachs J. (2001). Notes on a new sociology of economic development, in Samuel P. Huntington, Culture matters: How values shape human progress, Basic Books, 29–43.
  38. 38. Telecom operators of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan signed a Memorandum of Cooperation [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://en.trend.az/azerbaijan/business/3497801.html
  39. 39. UNCTAD: Digital economy report (2021) [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://unctad.org/webflyer/digital-economy-report-2021
  40. 40. Ventresca M. J. & Seidel V.P. (2020). The T-M-O framework: Strategic innovation across technology, markets, and organization. Said Business School Teaching, Note TN-2020–001.
  41. 41. WeForum (2023). Global risks report [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2023.pdf?_gl=1*drjd1w*_up*MQ..&gclid=CjwKCAiAzp6eBhByEiwA_gGq5EZi-Z2XEixV1yohC3hMWL0ZaeQnbKKMPS6RDJD6_SOwfkrATrQddhoCiw8QAvD_BwE
  42. 42. World Bank [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/overview

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.