Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The right to keep and bear arms in the United States: State Courts precedents in the 19th century

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-117935
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Shulus A.A. 1
Work direction:
Юриспруденция
Rating:
Article accesses:
3138
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
1 Lomonosov Moscow State University
For citation:
Shulus A. A. (2017). The right to keep and bear arms in the United States: State Courts precedents in the 19th century. Interactive science, 180-182. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-117935

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 342.7

Abstract

In the article the author describes activities of State Courts in the 19th century on the admissibility of the right to keep and bear arms. The researcher has analyzed the most important precedents of State Courts and presented the jurisprudence evolution in this sphere.

References

  1. 1. Ky. (2 Litt.) 90 Bliss v. Commonwealth (1822).
  2. 2. Tenn. (2 Hump.) 154 Aymette v. State (1840).
  3. 3. Ark. (2 Pike) 18 State v. Buzzard (1842).
  4. 4. N.C. (5 Ired.) 250 State v. Newsom (1844).
  5. 5. La. Ann. 489, 52 Am. Dec. 599 State v. Chandler (1850).
  6. 6. Lott, J.R. More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Third Edition. University of Chicago Press. – 2013. – 472 p.
  7. 7. Ga. 243 Nunn v. State (1846)
  8. 8. Thomas, R. Pay Attention to Politics!: Politics Will Pay Attention To You. Xlibris Corporation, 2009, 129 p.
  9. 9. Tex. 455 State v. Duke (1875).
  10. 10. Cramer C.E. The Racist Roots of Gun Control. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 4:2, Winter 1995.
  11. 11. Tenn. 165 Andrews v. State (1871).

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.