Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The importance of science as an institution for the production of intellectual labor

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-466169
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Gimaeva E. K. 1
Work direction:
Экономика
Rating:
Article accesses:
2466
Published in:
doaj
КиберЛенинка
eLibrary.ru
1 FSFEI of HE "A.N. Tupolev Kazan national research technical university - KAI"
For citation:
Gimaeva E. K. (2017). The importance of science as an institution for the production of intellectual labor. Interactive science, 70-72. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-466169

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 33

Abstract

According to the author, the functioning of intellectual labor in the postindustrial economy requires the creation of a new institutional environment. It is only science that acts as one of the main institutions of production and consumption of resources for the qualitative development of indicators of intellectual labor in Russia.

References

  1. 1. (2017). Informatsionno-statisticheskii material "Statistika nauki i obrazovaniia". Vyp. 5. Organizatsii i personal, vypolniaiushchie nauchnye issledovaniia i razrabotki. M.
  2. 2. (2013). Prognoz dolgosrochnogo ekonomicheskogo razvitiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2030 goda. M-vo ekon. razvitiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M.
  3. 3. Khasanova, A. Sh. (2015). Institutsional'naia sreda intellektual'noi sobstvennosti: protivorechiia razvitiia. Vestnik KGTU im. A.N. Tupoleva, 2, pp. 297-300.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.