Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Artistic means of expressiveness used in dialogues to describe colloquial speech in the works of Bernhard Schlink

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-470796
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Authors:
Lyamina A. G. 1 , Ganzhara O. A. 1
Work direction:
Филология
Rating:
Article accesses:
2657
Published in:
doaj
КиберЛенинка
eLibrary.ru
1 Institute of Humanities of FSAEI of HPE "North-Caucasus Federal University"
For citation:
Lyamina A. G., & Ganzhara O. A. (2018). Artistic means of expressiveness used in dialogues to describe colloquial speech in the works of Bernhard Schlink. Interactive science, 57-60. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-470796

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 1751

Abstract

This article deals with the problem of describing the dialogical speech within the framework of the work of Bernhard Schlink, attention is paid to the linguistic elements used to transmit communicative acts and to the authors' goals aimed at the realization of creative intent. The purpose of the work is to consider the features of the transmission of live, real speech in the works of Bernhard Schlink. The work is of a survey nature. It provides examples of the author's use of phonetic, lexical and syntactic elements of the language, which contribute to the creation of a real dialogical speech between the characters. It was revealed that the description of communal acts in the works of Bernhard Schlink is characterized by a tendency to a strong emotional impact on the reader, the use of means of various linguistic levels responds to the author's desire to differentiate the text of the work in a stylistic way. From the lexical point of view Schlink resorts to the use of various kinds of colloquial elements of the language or units of low style, here are used phraseological units, modal particles, interjections, etc. From the syntactic side, the author uses incomplete sentences, free word order and etc. In the phonetic plan, the author shortens words, deafens them, as this happens during a real communicative act. The use of colloquial elements in the works allows the author to diversify the text stylistically and makes it more interesting for the reader, which is confirmed by the fact that Bernhard Schlink belongs to the most popular German writers of the day.

References

  1. 1. Vinogradow V.V. The problems of russian stylistics / V.V. Vinogradow. – M.: Vysshaya Shkola Publishers, 1981. – 260 s.
  2. 2. Devkin V.D. Features of German spoken language / V.D. Devkin. – M.: Intercultural Relationships, 1965. –205 s.
  3. 3. Zemskaya E.A. Russian spoken language: linguistic analysis and problems of education / E.A. Zemskaya. – M.: Russion language, 1979. – 106 s.
  4. 4. Malinovich U.M. Expression and connotation of sentence: Problems of emotionally expressive syntax / U.M. Malinovich. – Irkutsk: Irkutsk state University Publishers, 1989. – 117 s.
  5. 5. Shvedowa N.U. Essays on the syntax of spoken language / N.U. Shvedowa. –M.: Academy of Sciences, 1960. – 112 s.
  6. 6. Jakubinski L.P. Selected works. Language and its functions / L.P. Jakubinski. – M.: Science, 1986. – 226 s.
  7. 7. Brinkmann H. Die Deutsche Sprache. Gestalt und Leistung / H. Brink-mann. –Düsseldorf: Schwann, 1971. – 114 s.
  8. 8. Schlink B. Das Wochenende / B. Schlink. – Zürich: Diogenes Verlag, 2008. – 338 s.
  9. 9. Schlink B. Der Vorleser / B. Schlink. – Zürich: Diogenes Verlag, 1995. – 345 s.
  10. 10. Schlink B. Sommerlügen / B. Schlink. – Zürich: Diogenes Verlag, 1994. – 356 s.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.