Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

US military language group in signs of language and culture

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-475258
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Angaleva M.A. 1
Work direction:
Филология
Rating:
Article accesses:
1989
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
1 FSOMEI of HE "Military University" of the Ministry of Defense of Russian Federation
For citation:
Angaleva M. A. (2019). US military language group in signs of language and culture. Interactive science, 31-33. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-475258

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 8

Abstract

The relevance of this study is determined by the importance of theoretical and practical analysis of issues related to intercultural communication. The object of this paper is the extralinguistic aspect of the U.S. military lingo. The subject area embraces distinctive linguistic phenomena of the military subcultural milieu, going back to the historical and cultural heritage of military society and thus characterized by extralinguistic context. As exemplified in English, the authors point out, that success of cross-cultural communication is largely determined both by a high level of linguistic competence and background knowledge.

References

  1. 1. Zherebilo T.V. Slovar' lingvisticheskih terminov / T.V. Zherebilo. Izd. 5-e, ispr. i dop. Nazran': Piligrim, 2010. 486 s.
  2. 2. Komissarov V.N. Sovremennoe perevodovedenie: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: ETS. 2002. 424 s.
  3. 3. Romanov A.S., Shnyakina K.V. Devizy rodov vojsk i vidov vooruzhennyh sil SShA v kontekste etnokul'turnoj stereotipizacii // «Sovremennaya nauka: Aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki». Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki №9/2 sentyabr' 2018 g. M.: Nauchnye tekhnologii. S. 152–157.
  4. 4. Romanov A.S. Sistema cennostej armejskoj subkul'turnoj sredy SShA v znakah yazyka i kul'tury // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. №3 (81). Ch. 2. C. 364–366.
  5. 5. Romanov A.S. Etnicheskie stereotipy armejskoj subkul'turnoj sredy SShA v znakah yazyka i kul'tury: monografiya / A. S. Romanov. M.: Voennyj universitet, 2017. 231 s.
  6. 6. Sepir E. Polozhenie lingvistiki kak nauki / Zvegincev V.A. Istoriya yazykoznaniya XIX i XX vekov v ocherkah i izvlecheniyah. M.: izd-vo Minprosveshcheniya RSFSR, 1960. Ch. 2.
  7. 7. Sudzilovskij G.A. Sleng – chto eto takoe? Anglijskaya prostorechnaya voennaya leksika / G. A. Sudzilovskij. M.: Voenizdat, 1973. 182 s.
  8. 8. Shvejcer A.D. Teoriya perevoda. M., 1968.
  9. 9. Shevchuk V.N. Spravochnik voennogo perevodchika. Spb.: Rus', 2016. 400 s.
  10. 10. Idioms.thefreedictionary.com [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/been+to+the+wars (data obrashcheniya: 12.07.18)
  11. 11. Spears A.R. Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. McGraw-Hill’s Companies, 2005. 1080 p.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.