Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Direct quotation as a means of evaluation (on the material of RF president V.V. Putin’s quoting In the mass media of the USA)

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-496641
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Bajenova E. Y. 1
Work direction:
Philology
Rating:
Article accesses:
1830
Published in:
eLibrary.ru
1 FSBEI of HE "Amur State University"
For citation:
Bajenova E. Y. (2019). Direct quotation as a means of evaluation (on the material of RF president V.V. Putin’s quoting In the mass media of the USA). Interactive science, 46-47. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-496641

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 8

Abstract

The article is devoted to viewing the role of direct quotation in evaluation of a politician. By quoting political leaders, journalists can exactly report one’s words and thus create the effect of impartiality and authenticity of the information presented in an article. Also, quoting allows expressing opinion overtly or covertly, that is renders evaluation.

References

  1. 1. Varchenko, V. V. (2007). Tsitatnaia rech' v media-tekste., 268. M.: Editorial URSS.
  2. 2. Rozental', D. E., & Telenkova, M. A. (1985). Slovar'-spravochnik lingvisticheskikh terminov., 399. M.: Prosveshchenie.
  3. 3. The New York Times: ofitsial'nyi sait. Retrieved from https://www.ny-times.com
  4. 4. The Washington Post: ofitsial'nyi sait. Retrieved from https://www.was-hingtonpost.com

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.