Social School of Human Resource Management: Succession and Synthesis of Ideas
Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-552195
Open Access
- Published in:
- Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
- Authors:
- Ivanova E. I. 1 , Poliakov V. A. 1
- Work direction:
- Социология
- Rating:
- Article accesses:
- 1484
- Published in:
- eLibrary.ru
1 FSFEI of HE “Russian State Humanitarian University”
- APA
For citation:
Ivanova E. I., & Poliakov V. A. (2020). Social School of Human Resource Management: Succession and Synthesis of Ideas. Interactive science, 28-33. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-552195
- Full text
- Metrics
UDC 31
DOI: 10.21661/r-552195
Abstract
Functioning of the organization in conditions of high uncertainty of the external environment increases the requirements for the creative and search nature of the Manager's activities. The article examines the current social schools of human resource management, from the classical school to the empirical school of scientific management, from formal organizational concepts to sociological models of interaction between generations in the process of activity. Synthesis of various theoretical approaches, its application in practice, allows managers to adapt to new conditions of life, improve the efficiency of management and staff performance.
References
- 1. Faiol', A., & Gasteva, A. K. (1923). Obshchee i promyshlennoe upravlenie., . Faiol';; M.: Tsentral'nyi institut truda.
- 2. Ionina, L. G., & Veber, M. (2016). Khoziaistvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimaiushchei sotsiologii. Veber;; M.: ID Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki.
- 3. Marks, K., & Engel's, F. Sochineniia. T. 3., 44-45.
- 4. Druker, P. F. (2004). Entsiklopediia menedzhmenta., 20. M.: ID "Vil'iams".
- 5. Dudchenko, V. S. (1982). Innovatsionnaia igra kak metod issledovaniia i razvitiia organizatsii. Aktivnye metody obucheniia pri povyshenii kvalifikatsii rukovodiashchikh rabotnikov i spetsialistov Minneftekhnmproma. Otraslevaia nauchno-metodicheskaia konferentsiia. -. Iaroslavl': IPKNeftekhim.
- 6. Robbinz, S. P., & Koulter, M. (2007). Menedzhment. M.: Vil'iams.
- 7. Shcherbiny, V. V., Aleksandrov, V. A., Veshchugina, T. S., & Gerchikov, V. I. (2004). Upravlenie chelovecheskimi resursami: menedzhment i konsul'tirovanie. M.: Nezavisimyi institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva.
- 8. Ivanova, E. I. (2016). Pokolenie v zerkale sotsial'no-demograficheskogo analiza. M.: Izd-vo RGGU.
- 9. Bravennan, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
- 10. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Barbara, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- 11. Likert, R. (1961). New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- 12. Retrieved from https://www.kellyservices.ru/ru/siteassets/uploadedfiles/1-images/misc_images/ru_docs/nr20report20ru.pdf
Comments(0)