Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie zhenshchin, poseshchaiushchikh gruppovye zaniatiia v fitnes-klube

Proceeding
DOI: 10.21661/r-466843
Open Access
III International Scientific and Practical Conference «Educational environment today: development strategy»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
III International Scientific and Practical Conference «Educational environment today: development strategy»
Authors:
Malinauskas R.K. 1 , Nizhnik D. 1
Work direction:
Физическое воспитание и здоровьесберегающая деятельность
Rating:
Article accesses:
1810
Published in:
eLibrary.ru
1 Lithuanian Sports University
For citation:

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics

Abstract

The aim of the study is to reveal the indicators of the psychological well-being of women attending group fitness classes. To achieve this goal Riff's scale of psychological well-being was used as a method of measuring of psychological well-being indicators. The results of the conducted research showed that younger women have higher scores on the " purpose in life " and "personal growth" scales.

References

  1. 1. Минюрова С.А. Личностные детерминанты психологического благополучия педагога / С.А. Минюрова, И.В. Заусенко // Педагогическое образование в России. – 2013. – №1. – С. 94–101.
  2. 2. Лепешинский H.H. Адаптация опросника «Шкалы психологического благополучия» К. Рифф. / H.H. Лепешинский // Психологический журнал. – 2007. – №3. – С. 24–27.
  3. 3. Ryff C.D. The structure of psychological well-being revisited / C.D. Ryff, C.M. Keyes // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. – 1995. – V. 69. – P. 719–727.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.