Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Cultural forms of thinking as translation-communicative basis of the individual

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-467267
Open Access
International academic journal «Human and Society»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Human and Society»
Authors:
Chekrygina T. A. 1 , Ivashchenko A. P. 2
Work direction:
Этнография и историческая антропология
Rating:
Article accesses:
2292
Published in:
doaj
КиберЛенинка
eLibrary.ru
1 FGBUK Rostovskoi oblasti "Razdorskii etnograficheskii muzei-zapovednik"
2 FSFEI of HE “Rostov State Medical University” of Russian Ministry of Health
For citation:
Chekrygina T. A., & Ivashchenko A. P. (2017). Cultural forms of thinking as translation-communicative basis of the individual. Human and Society, 28-30. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-467267

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Reviewing
  • Metrics
UDC 9

Abstract

Social psychology approach to cultural dynamics used by the authors formed within the framework of the cultural and historical concept is a comparative analysis of cultural-historical process that helps to identify its main characteristic features of a particular cultural community, which are the most sustainable socio-cultural entities (cultural forms) and perform translation-communication function of the culture impact on personality development and social relations. The authors concluded that cultural forms were the main determinants of socio-cultural identification with internal mechanism – cultural forms of thinking

References

  1. 1. Asmolov A.G. Psihologiya lichnosti_ kulturno_istoricheskoe ponimanie raz_vitiya cheloveka.... M._ 2008. S. 32.
  2. 2. Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kulturi_ Dva filos.vvedeniya v dvadcat pervii vek. – M._ Politizdat. 1990_413s.
  3. 3. Vigotskii L.S. Sobr.soch._ V 6t. T. 4 . M._1984_ s. 360.
  4. 4. Kant I. Chto znachit orientirovatsya v mishlenii // Soch. T. 8 M. 1994, s. 103.
  5. 5. Kalinin A.V. Iz arhiva pisatelya. _(gazeta «Donskaya rech» 21 avgusta 1996g. statya «Jit po sovesti i chesti» dialog s A. Kalininim)
  6. 6. Kont O. Kurs pozitivnoi filosofii. Tom. 3. _Antologiya mirovoi filosofii. M._ 1971. T. 3. S. 553_556.,
  7. 7. Mol A. Sociodinamika kulturi/Mir cherez kulturu. M._Izd-vo MGTU, 1995, s. 38–57.
  8. 8. Freid Z. Massovaya psihologiya i analiz chelovecheskogo «Ya». V 2 t. T.2.Tbilisi, 1991, s. 211.
  9. 9. Chekrigina T.A. Sociokulturnie determinanti identifikacii lichnosti. Rostov n/D_ Izd_vo Rost.un-ta,2006, 320 s.
  10. 10. Chekrigina T.A. Metamorfozi sociokulturnoi identifikacii lichnosti v Rossii_ Rostov- na-Donu, Izd. DGTU, 2013g., 170 s.
  11. 11. Yung K.G. Arhetip i simvol _Seriya «stranici mirovoi filosofii»,. M._1991_s.137.
  12. 12. Yaspers K. Smisl i naznachenie istorii. M._1991_s. 32.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.