Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The impact assessment of the quality management system in leading organization of MIC (military-industrial complex) integrated structure

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-468419
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Kunitsyn A. M. 1
Work direction:
Экономика
Rating:
Article accesses:
2857
Published in:
doaj
КиберЛенинка
eLibrary.ru
1 Institute of Economics and Law of Moscow Technological University (MIREA)
For citation:
Kunitsyn A. M. (2018). The impact assessment of the quality management system in leading organization of MIC (military-industrial complex) integrated structure. Interactive science, 43-46. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-468419

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 33

Abstract

The article has discussed the problem concerning the absence of a unified method in the impact assessment of the quality management system. The author has indicated the documents that allow defining the impact assessment of the quality management system. The paper contains the hierarchical criteria structure on effectiveness of the quality management system.

References

  1. 1. (2012). Metodika otsenki rezul'tativnosti sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva predpriiatii (organizatsii) oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa. M.: SDS "Voennyi registr".
  2. 2. (2006). Metodika otsenki rezul'tativnosti sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva organizatsii., 17. M.: SDS "Voennyi registr".

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.