Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

British educators and philosophers of education about the features and trends of modern comparative education science

Proceeding
DOI: 10.21661/r-471736
Open Access
International Research-to-practice conference «Education and science in the modern context»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Education and science in the modern context»
Author:
Beliaev G. I. 1
Work direction:
Педагогика
Rating:
Article accesses:
1671
Published in:
eLibrary.ru
1 Tsentr strategii i teorii razvitiia lichnosti FGBNU "Institut strategii razvitiia obrazovaniia RAO"
For citation:
Beliaev G. I. (2018). British educators and philosophers of education about the features and trends of modern comparative education science. Education and science in the modern context, 70-78. Чебоксары: SCC "Interactive plus", LLC. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-471736

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics

Abstract

Abstract. The article is devoted to analysis of core functions and the leading trends in modern education comparative studies (comparative pedagogy), presented in the writings of the most authoritative representatives of pedagogical thought in the United Kingdom Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Against the background of the brief scientific essays portraits of several British scientists, it highlights the main ideas of scientific creativity, sketches of articles showing how their contents serve comparative literature in Britain as a whole (as an approach, method and the study per se). As a result of this comparative analysis, the author outlines the most important functions of the educational comparative science and the approaches on which it is based, that can be useful for the Russian education.

Acknowledgments

Работа выполнена в рамках поддержанного РФФИ научного проекта № 17-06-00122-ОГН Современная педагогическая компаративистика: роль, функции и факторы развития

References

  1. 1. Бродфут П. Сопоставительный анализ классной работы английских и французских учителей / П. Бродфут // Перспективы. – 1986. – №2.
  2. 2. Воскресенская Н.М. Педагогические исследования в Великобритании / Н. М. Воскресенская // Portalus.ru: Научная цифровая библиотека [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://portalus.ru/modules/shkola/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1193229652&archive=1195596940&start_from=&ucat=& (дата обращения: 04.05.2018).
  3. 3. Гидденс Э. Последствия современности /Э. Гидденс; пер. с англ. Г.К. Ольховикова, Д.А. Кибальчича, вступ. статья Т.А. Дмитриева. – М.: Праксис, 2011. – 352 с.
  4. 4. Фуллан М. Выбор ложных движущих сил для реформ целостной системы / М.Фуллан // Вопросы образования. – 2011. – №4. – С. 79–104.
  5. 5. Фуллан М. Новое понимание реформ в образовании / М.Фуллан. – М.: Просвещение, 2006. – 272 с.
  6. 6. Broadfoot, Patricia, Crossley, Michael Schweisfurth, Michele. Changing Educational Contexts, Issues and Identities: 40 years of Comparative Education Ed. by the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2006.
  7. 7. Giddens, A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991.
  8. 8. Giddens, A. Off the edge of history. The world in the 21st century. Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture, London, 2015.
  9. 9. Hargreaves D. Teaching as a Researched-based Profession: possibilities and prospects. London, 1996.
  10. 10. Holmes, B. Theories and Methods in Comparative Education; ed. by J. Schriver and B. Holmes. – Frankfurt am Main, 1988.
  11. 11. White J. Philosophical Perspectives on School Effectiveness and School Improvement // The Curriculum Journal. 1997. V. 8. N 1.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.