Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

Human freedom and border situations in the physical history of existentialism

Proceeding
DOI: 10.21661/r-496855
Open Access
International Research-to-practice conference «Science and education: future development»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Science and education: future development»
Author:
Latypov N.O. 1
Scientific adviser:
Frolova N.A.2
Work direction:
Философия
Rating:
Article accesses:
1313
1 FSBEI of THE "Lipetsk State Pedagogical University named after P.P. Semenov-Tyan-Shanskiy"
2 FSBEI of THE "Lipetsk State Pedagogical University named after P.P. Semenov-Tyan-Shanskiy"
For citation:
Latypov N. O. (2019). Human freedom and border situations in the physical history of existentialism. Science and education: future development, 103-106. Чебоксары: SCC "Interactive plus", LLC. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-496855

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics

Abstract

This article discusses the concepts of "freedom" and "borderline situations", their interaction. The views of the leading existentialist philosophers regarding these concepts were also examined in detail.

References

  1. 1. Кьеркегор С. Болезнь к смерти. – М., 2012.
  2. 2. Сартр Ж.-П. Экзистенциализм – это гуманизм. – М., 2006.
  3. 3. Сартр Ж.-П. Бытие и ничто. – М., 2009.
  4. 4. Фромм Э. Бегство от свободы. – М., 2017.
  5. 5. Ясперс К. Философия. Кн. 2. Просветление экзистенции. – М., 2012.
  6. 6. Ясперс К. Введение в философию. Философская автобиография. – М., 2017.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.