List of publications on a keyword: «инновационная инфраструктура»


Экономика

Publication date: 28.11.2022
Evaluate the material Average score: 0 (Всего: 0)
Liudmila V. Filippova
Aleksei S. Ivanov , candidate of economic sciences
FSAEI of HE "Volgograd State University" , Волгоградская обл

«Razvitie innovatsionnogo predprinimatel'stva v strategicheskom razvitii ekonomiki Volgogradskoi oblasti»

Download an article

В статье рассматриваются возможности и проблемы развития регионального инновационного предпринимательства на примере Волгоградской области. Целью статьи является разработка предложений по совершенствованию практики включения малых инновационных предпринимательских структур в систему стратегического развития региона. Авторами рассмотрены основные тенденции развития инновационного потенциала и предпринимательской инфраструктуры региона, указаны основные проблемные области, связанные прежде всего с развитием регионального промышленного комплекса. Предложены направления интеграции малых предпринимательских структур в систему стратегического развития Волгоградской области.

Технические науки

Publication date: 21.10.2019
Evaluate the material Average score: 0 (Всего: 0)
Vladimir A. Eliseev , doctor of engineering sciences , professor, chief research scientist
CJSC "Institute of Innovation and Technology Management" , Москва г
Iurii I. Degtiariov , doctor of engineering sciences , professor, chief research scientist
FGBNU "Ekspertno-analiticheskii tsentr" , Москва г

«Functional Variability of Technological Platforms in Innovation Infrastructure»

Download an article

The subject of the work is innovative development, the theme is the role and specificity of «platform» management in the infrastructure of innovative development, and the purpose is to display the multi-functional variability of the participation of technological platforms in the innovation and infrastructure management practice of the EU, Russia and EurAsEC. The methodology of the work consists in the application of elements of system analysis (accepted and expected state decisions) in the innovative sphere of scientific and technological development, concerning: comparative characteristics of approaches to the creation of platforms in the EU and the Russian Federation, comparative characteristics of platforms and clusters, the order of formation of the list of platforms, proposals for regulation and requirements for the form of content and illustrative examples of functional and consolidated variability of platforms in the innovation infrastructure of domestic platforms, orientation and implementation of EurAsEC platforms. The research is based on the general scientific method (problem statement, information-analytical generalizations, classification and analogies, analysis and synthesis, inductive-deductive approach). The results of the work are that on the basis of the organizational and managerial Genesis of the EU technological platforms, the mission of the platforms in the innovation infrastructure of the Russian Federation and EurAsEC is outlined. The field of application of the results is the formation, implementation and expected prospects of domestic technological platforms. Summary. The functional variability of domestic technological platforms, which are communication tools of innovative development, is characterized by participation in the implementation of National priorities of this development, development Strategies of the Russian Federation, National projects, National technological initiatives, State and Federal target programs, Programs of measures to support promising industries, in the planned creation of the first technological valley, in clusters and technological engineering, in the formation of Eurasian platforms. Based on consideration of the mission platforms in the innovation infra-structure, contribution of organizational management Genesis platforms of the EU and the functional variability of the implementation of domestic platforms, it can be considered that the Russian Federation defined the role of the state as regulator of the platforms (not the participant or the mediator controls). The practice of formation and implementation of platforms of the Russian Federation is not without infrastructural management problems: there is still insufficient interest of big business in the activities of platforms and, as a consequence, extra – budgetary underfunding of projects and programs; «vagueness» of responsibility for the development of technologies (in the conditions of formation of " top «with the initiative of» bottom»); non-obvious coordination of interaction between platform participants and inter-budgetary regional relations; dependence and strengthening of external risks of the Russian Federation on participation/import of foreign capital and technologies; uncertainty of control procedures; lack of criteria/indicators of expected efficiency. Not all platforms of the Russian Federation and EurAsEC are guaranteed to be effective, but the success of any of them will form a new market of innovative products with the expected prospect of long-term development.

Экономика

Publication date: 05.02.2018
Evaluate the material Average score: 0 (Всего: 0)
Stepan V. Shchekin
FSBEI of HE "Volga State University of Telecommunication and Informatics" , Самарская обл

«Развитие инновационной деятельности в Российских вузах: новые тенденции»

Download an article

В статье рассмотрены особенности инновационной деятельности российских вузов и ключевые проблемы на пути повышения инновационной активности учебных заведений. Кроме того, автором были выявлены существующие тенденции развития инновационной деятельности высших учебных заведений РФ.

Технические науки

Publication date: 27.04.2017
Evaluate the material Average score: 0 (Всего: 0)
Natalia S. Dorofeeva
Elena V. Redkolis , candidate of engineering sciences
FSBEI of HE "Komsomolsk-Na-Amure State Technical University" , Хабаровский край

«The Common information space of the Training and Consulting Center design»

Download an article

The article describes the relevance of the research, such as the assessment of the educational and consulting services market and also the competitive environment based on the analysis of the regional innovative infrastructure. The results of the center activity design are presented, and the basis of the concept of this center functioning is TRIZ (the Theory of Invention Tasks Solving). The basic functional capabilities of the common information space (CIS) are formulated and justified in this research, the CIS-structure is formed, the interfaces of the information resources in the CIS for the interaction with potential users have been developed, and data modeling has been carried out.

Экономика (экономическая теория, финансы, бухгалтерский учет, статистика и др.)

Publication date: 23.05.2015
Evaluate the material Average score: 0 (Всего: 0)
Nataliya E. Bondarenko , candidate of economic sciences
Elena B. Kazarinova , candidate of economic sciences
FSBEI of HE "Plekhanov Russian University of Economics" , Москва г

«Инновационная политика государства как стратегическая задача обеспечения национальной безопасности России»

Download an article

В статье рассмотрена роль государства в условиях формирований инновационной экономики, выделены общие принципы формирования и реализации государственной инновационной политики, позволяющие определить наиболее эффективные методы государственного воздействия на современное инновационное развитие экономики России с учетом политических и экономических событий 2014 года.

Образовательная среда высшего учебного заведения

Publication date: 25.06.2015
Evaluate the material Average score: 0 (Всего: 0)
Anastasiia O. Larionova , candidate of pedagogic sciences
FSBEI of HE "East Siberia State University of Technology and Management" , Бурятия Респ

«Инновационная инфраструктура вуза как интегральное средство профессионального развития студентов»

Download an article

В статье обсуждаются вопросы необходимости развития исследовательской и базирующейся на ней инновационно-предпринимательской деятельности, разработки механизма инновационной инфраструктуры вуза как важнейшего условия эффективности их деятельности в качестве новых точек экономического и инновационного роста в экономике, основанной на знаниях.