Центр научного сотрудничества "Интерактив плюс"
info@interactive-plus.ru
+7 (8352) 222-490
2130122532
Центр научного сотрудничества «Интерактив плюс»
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
428000, Россия, Чувашская Республика, г. Чебоксары, улица Гражданская, дом 75
+7 (8352) 222-490
RU
428000
Чувашская Республика
г.Чебоксары
ул.Гражданская, д.75
56.125001
47.208966

The person as «transcendental object» in transcendental philosophy of Immanuel Kant

Research Article
DOI: 10.21661/r-16982
Open Access
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monthly international scientific journal «Interactive science»
Author:
Zykov M. B. 1
Work direction:
Философия
Rating:
Article accesses:
4512
Published in:
doaj
eLibrary.ru
1 FSBEI of HE "Bunin Yelets State University"
For citation:
Zykov M. B. (2016). The person as «transcendental object» in transcendental philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Interactive science, 111-114. https://doi.org/10.21661/r-16982

  • Metadata
  • Full text
  • Metrics
UDC 141

Abstract

Since the human biological body represents the ontic reality of the same nature as onticity of surrounding world, the human psychic also must be ontic. And all the reality should be knowledgeable to the accuracy of fulfillment of the humankind practical needs. But, possibly, the mechanism of human insanity and genius are not knowledgeable.

References

  1. 1. Васильев В.В. Кант Иммануил (1724–1804) // Большая Энциклопедия Кирилла и Мефодия. В 10 CD. – М., 2005.
  2. 2. Кант И. Кртика чистого разума. – М., 1964.
  3. 3. Asmus V.F. Kant, Immanuel // Great Soviet Encyclopedia (A translation of the third edition). – Vol. 11. – New York: Macmillan, inc. etc., 1976.
  4. 4. Price, Joan A. Critical Philosophy: Immanuel Kant // Understanding Philosophy (Medieval and Modern Philosophy). – USA: Chelsea House Publishers, 2008. – P. 84–98.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.