List of publications on a keyword: «Fermat»

In 1637, Pierre de Fermat wrote at the margins of Diophantus’ Arithmetica that he had found a truly wonderful proof of the insolvability of the Diophantine equation a^n + b^n = c^n, where n > 2, but the narrow margins of the books did not allow him to give the full proof. Is there a short and easy way to prove Fermat's Last Theorem? The following ABC conjecture states that for three co-prime numbers A, B, and C which satisfy A + B = C, the product of the prime factors of ABC is usually not much less than C. Both theorems are formulated very simply, but are extremely difficult to prove. Hundreds of pages have been spent by eminent mathematicians of Western world searching for proofs, and the search for proofs continues. The author found new methods of proof that are generally understandable, even to schoolchildren on the basis of a synthesis of several sciences, including physics. Number theory plays an interesting role in pedagogy.

In 1637, Pierre de Fermat wrote at the margins of Diophantus’ Arithmetica that he had found a truly wonderful proof of the insolvability of the Diophantine equation a^n + b^n = c^n, where n > 2, but the narrow margins of the books did not allow him to give the full proof. Is there a short and easy way to prove Fermat's Last Theorem? The following ABC conjecture states that for three co-prime numbers A, B, and C which satisfy A + B = C, the product of the prime factors of ABC is usually not much less than C. Both theorems are formulated very simply, but are extremely difficult to prove. Hundreds of pages have been spent by eminent mathematicians of Western world searching for proofs, and the search for proofs continues. The author found new methods of proof that are generally understandable, even to schoolchildren on the basis of a synthesis of several sciences, including physics. Number theory plays an interesting role in pedagogy.

In 1637, Pierre de Fermat wrote at the margins of Diophantus’ Arithmetica that he had found a truly wonderful proof of the insolvability of the Diophantine equation a^n + b^n = c^n, where n > 2, but the narrow margins of the books did not allow him to give the full proof. Is there a short and easy way to prove Fermat's Last Theorem? The following ABC conjecture states that for three co-prime numbers A, B, and C which satisfy A + B = C, the product of the prime factors of ABC is usually not much less than C. Both theorems are formulated very simply, but are extremely difficult to prove. Hundreds of pages have been spent by eminent mathematicians of Western world searching for proofs, and the search for proofs continues. The author found new methods of proof that are generally understandable, even to schoolchildren on the basis of a synthesis of several sciences, including physics. Number theory plays an interesting role in pedagogy.

In this publication, the author proposes to find an elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem from the point of view of an engineering approach. As a model, a construction of three concentrically nested n-cubes or spheres with a common centre and integer edges or radii, a, b, c, is studied, provided that each point/unit cube of a small sphere corresponds to another point/unit cube of this subset of layers between the middle and the large sphere enclosed spheres. An insoluble conflict between the symmetric form and the content of the construction is studied for the case when n is greater than two. The proposed proof forces us to make broader generalisations concerning the necessity of the asymmetry of the universe as a condition for the emergence of matter and the origin of life. The proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, known as the "mathematical pearl", has an important symbolic, historical and educational significance.

The article is about the fact that the extraordinary beauty and conciseness of the formulation of Fermat's Last Theorem make us look for its visual solution. Let's try to consider Fermat's theorem from the eyes of physicist. Perhaps from this positions Pierre de Fermat found a solution whose main ideas would fit schematically in the fairly wide margins of the book, in a few drawings. Skeptics continue to believe that Pierre de Fermat was probably mistaken. Meanwhile, consistent application of the basic principles of physics, geometry, and engineering make us think differently.

Fermat's Last Theorem has been proved on the basis of school Physics, Mathematics, analytical Geometry. The main conceptions of the proof one can write on a math toy in the form of a wooden cube for children. Six faces of the cube are enough to deliver the main ideas of proof.

The researcher of this article attempts to develop another Way to address the Fermat’s problem based on a different logical space, limited by other axioms, which have been described in the previous article of the author.

In this article an attempt is made to move away from the traditional consideration of the problems of the Farm. As the author notes the fallacy of the traditional approach is that if the mathematician-fan was able to formulate a statement as proven, then specially trained and well-trained people could have made it easily. And, if they couldn’t, then there was a gap in the science of mathematics. A different approach is required.